Application perturb and observe maximum power point tracking with interconnection and damping assignment passive-based control for photovoltaic system using boost converter

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2025.6.13

Keywords:

photovoltaic generator, boost converter, passivity-based control, port-controlled Hamiltonian, maximum power point tracking

Abstract

Introduction. Power generation from renewable sources, such as photovoltaic (PV) power, has become increasingly important in replacing fossil fuels. A PV system’s maximum power point (MPP) moves along its power-voltage curve in response to environmental changes. Despite the use of maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms, the displacement of the MPP results in a decrease in PV system performance. Problem. Perturb & Observe (P&O) MPPT algorithm is a simple and effective algorithm, it can suffer from some drawbacks, such as oscillations around the MPP, slow tracking of rapid changes in irradiance, and reduced efficiency under temperature variation condition. The new MPPT control strategy for a solar PV system, based on passivity control, is presented. The goal of this study is to enhance the efficiency and stability of MPPT in PV systems by integrating the P&O algorithm with Interconnection and Damping Assignment Passivity-Based Control (IDA-PBC). Methodology. The new MPPT P&O PBC strategy aims to extract maximum power from the PV system in order to improve its efficiency under some conditions such as the variations of the temperature, the irradiation and the load. IDA-PBC is employed to design a Lyapunov asymptotically stable controller using the Hamiltonian structural properties of the open-loop model of the system. Also, with minimization of the energy dissipation in boost converter of the PV system to illustrate the modification of energy and generate a specify duty cycle applied to the converter. The results with MATLAB clearly demonstrate the advantages of the proposed MPPT P&O PBC, showcasing its high performance in effectively reducing oscillations in various steady states of the PV system, ensuring minimal overshoot and a faster response time. Scientific novelty. Key contributions include methodological improvements such as dynamic adjustment of the cycle for boost converter and a new approach to partner selection, which significantly optimizes the algorithm’s performance. Practical value. A comparative analysis of the proposed MPPT controller against conventional algorithms shows that it offers a fast dynamic response in finding the maximum power with significantly less oscillation around the MPP. References 46, tables 2, figures 13.

Author Biographies

A. Toualbia, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef

Associate Professor, Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Laboratoire Génie Electrique et Energies Renouvelables (LGEER)

A. B. Djilali, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef

Associate Professor, Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Laboratoire Génie Electrique et Energies Renouvelables (LGEER)

R. Taleb, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef

Professor, Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Laboratoire Génie Electrique et Energies Renouvelables (LGEER)

N. Mansour, University of Bahrain

Associate Professor, College of Engineering

M. Souaihia, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef

Associate Professor, Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Laboratoire Génie Electrique et Energies Renouvelables (LGEER)

H. Saidi, Hassiba Benbouali University of Chlef

Associate Professor, Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Technology, Laboratoire Génie Electrique et Energies Renouvelables (LGEER)

References

Ruffini A., Salerno A., Simões F. Net-zero emissions: Main technological, geopolitical, and economic consequences of the new energy scenario. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3998525.

Halkos G.E., Gkampoura E.-C. Reviewing Usage, Potentials, and Limitations of Renewable Energy Sources. Energies, 2020, vol. 13, no. 11, art. no. 2906. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112906.

Awasthi A., Shukla A.K., Murali Manohar S.R., Dondariya C., Shukla K.N., Porwal D., Richhariya G. Review on sun tracking technology in solar PV system. Energy Reports, 2020, vol. 6, pp. 392-405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.02.004.

Reindl K., Palm J. Installing PV: Barriers and enablers experienced by non-residential property owners. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, vol. 141, art. no. 110829. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110829.

Al-Amayreh M.I., Alahmer A., Manasrah A. A novel parabolic solar dish design for a hybrid solar lighting-thermal applications. Energy Reports, 2020, vol. 6, pp. 1136-1143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.11.063.

Djilali A., Yahdou A., Bounadja E., Mehedi F. Stopping the Drift Problem in the Tracking of Maximum Power Point for Photovoltaic System by Using Modified Variable Step Size Incremental Conductance Method. European Journal of Electrical Engineering, 2020, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 273-283. doi: https://doi.org/10.18280/ejee.220308.

Necaibia S., Kelaiaia M.S., Labar H., Necaibia A., Castronuovo E.D. Enhanced auto-scaling incremental conductance MPPT method, implemented on low-cost microcontroller and SEPIC converter. Solar Energy, 2019, vol. 180, pp. 152-168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.028.

Jedari Zare Zadeh M., Fathi S.H. A New Approach for Photovoltaic Arrays Modeling and Maximum Power Point Estimation in Real Operating Conditions. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2017, vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 9334-9343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2711571.

Alik R., Jusoh A. Modified Perturb and Observe (P&O) with checking algorithm under various solar irradiation. Solar Energy, 2017, vol. 148, pp. 128-139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.064.

Belkaid A., Colak I., Kayisli K. Implementation of a modified P&O-MPPT algorithm adapted for varying solar radiation conditions. Electrical Engineering, 2017, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 839-846. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-016-0457-3.

Al-Majidi S.D., Abbod M.F., Al-Raweshidy H.S. A novel maximum power point tracking technique based on fuzzy logic for photovoltaic systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, vol. 43, no. 31, pp. 14158-14171. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.002.

John R., Mohammed S.S., Zachariah R. Variable step size Perturb and observe MPPT algorithm for standalone solar photovoltaic system. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Techniques in Control, Optimization and Signal Processing (INCOS), 2017, pp. 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ITCOSP.2017.8303163.

Lachtar S., Bouraiou A., Djaafri O., Maouedj R. Smooth Sliding Mode-Based MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic Applications. 2019 1st Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM), 2019, pp. 253-258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/GPECOM.2019.8778484.

Yilmaz U., Kircay A., Borekci S. PV system fuzzy logic MPPT method and PI control as a charge controller. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, vol. 81, pp. 994-1001. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.048.

Li H., Yang D., Su W., Lu J., Yu X. An Overall Distribution Particle Swarm Optimization MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic System Under Partial Shading. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2019, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 265-275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2829668.

Xu D., Wang G., Yan W., Yan X. A novel adaptive command-filtered backstepping sliding mode control for PV grid-connected system with energy storage. Solar Energy, 2019, vol. 178, pp. 222-230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.033.

Al-Dhaifallah M., Nassef A.M., Rezk H., Nisar K.S. Optimal parameter design of fractional order control based INC-MPPT for PV system. Solar Energy, 2018, vol. 159, pp. 650-664. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.040.

Ferdous S.M., Shafiullah G.M., Oninda M.A.M., Shoeb M.A., Jamal T. Close loop compensation technique for high performance MPPT using ripple correlation control. 2017 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC), 2017, pp. 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/AUPEC.2017.8282429.

Lashab A., Sera D., Guerrero J.M. A Dual-Discrete Model Predictive Control-Based MPPT for PV Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2019, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 9686-9697. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2019.2892809.

Rezk H., Fathy A. Performance Improvement of PEM Fuel Cell Using Variable Step-Size Incremental Resistance MPPT Technique. Sustainability, 2020, vol. 12, no. 14, art. no. 5601. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145601.

Jately V., Azzopardi B., Joshi J., Venkateswaran B.V., Sharma A., Arora S. Experimental Analysis of hill-climbing MPPT algorithms under low irradiance levels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, vol. 150, art. no. 111467. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111467.

Bakar Siddique M.A., Asad A., Asif R.M., Rehman A.U., Sadiq M.T., Ullah I. Implementation of Incremental Conductance MPPT Algorithm with Integral Regulator by Using Boost Converter in Grid-Connected PV Array. IETE Journal of Research, 2023, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 3822-3835. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03772063.2021.1920481.

Ibrahim H.H., Elsaharty M.A., Guerrero J.M., Walid Ghoneim A.M. A Smart MPPT Algorithm with a Power Independent Tracking System. 2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET), 2022, pp. 1-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECET55527.2022.9872662.

Sarkar P.R., Minai A.F., Bhaskar M.S., Pachauri R.K., Sashikant. Examination of MPPT Algorithm on Three Step DC-DC Converter. 2022 IEEE 9th Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON), 2022, pp. 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/UPCON56432.2022.9986394.

Hayder W., Ogliari E., Dolara A., Abid A., Ben Hamed M., Sbita L. Improved PSO: A Comparative Study in MPPT Algorithm for PV System Control under Partial Shading Conditions. Energies, 2020, vol. 13, no. 8, art. no. 2035. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13082035.

Motamarri R., Bhookya N., Chitti Babu B. Modified grey wolf optimization for global maximum power point tracking under partial shading conditions in photovoltaic system. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 2021, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1884-1901. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.3018.

Abo-Elyousr F.K., Abdelshafy A.M., Abdelaziz A.Y. MPPT-Based Particle Swarm and Cuckoo Search Algorithms for PV Systems. Green Energy and Technology, 2020, pp. 379-400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05578-3_14.

Hassan T., Abbassi R., Jerbi H., Mehmood K., Tahir M.F., Cheema K.M., Elavarasan R.M., Ali F., Khan I.A. A Novel Algorithm for MPPT of an Isolated PV System Using Push Pull Converter with Fuzzy Logic Controller. Energies, 2020, vol. 13, no. 15, art. no. 4007. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13154007.

Zhang Y., Wang Y.-J., Yu J.-Q. A Novel MPPT Algorithm for Photovoltaic Systems Based on Improved Sliding Mode Control. Electronics, 2022, vol. 11, no. 15, art. no. 2421. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11152421.

Díaz Martínez D., Trujillo Codorniu R., Giral R., Vázquez Seisdedos L. Evaluation of particle swarm optimization techniques applied to maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic systems. International Journal of Circuit Theory and Applications, 2021, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1849-1867. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cta.2978.

Premkumar M., Sumithira T.R. Humpback whale assisted hybrid maximum power point tracking algorithm for partially shaded solar photovoltaic systems. Journal of Power Electronics, 2018, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1805-1818. doi: https://doi.org/10.6113/JPE.2018.18.6.1805.

El-Helw H.M., Magdy A., Marei M.I. A Hybrid Maximum Power Point Tracking Technique for Partially Shaded Photovoltaic Arrays. IEEE Access, 2017, vol. 5, pp. 11900-11908. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2717540.

Harrag A., Messalti S. PSO‐based SMC variable step size P&O MPPT controller for PV systems under fast changing atmospheric conditions. International Journal of Numerical Modelling: Electronic Networks, Devices and Fields, 2019, vol. 32, no. 5, art. no. e2603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jnm.2603.

Wang L., Wei X., Shao Y., Zhu T., Zhang J. MPPT of PV array using stepped-up chaos optimization algorithm. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering & Computer Sciences, 2015, vol. 23, pp. 1748-1760. doi: https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1404-176.

Moradi M.H., Reisi A.R. A hybrid maximum power point tracking method for photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy, 2011, vol. 85, no. 11, pp. 2965-2976. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.08.036.

Enrique J.M., Andújar J.M., Bohórquez M.A. A reliable, fast and low cost maximum power point tracker for photovoltaic applications. Solar Energy, 2010, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 79-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2009.10.011.

Rezk H., Eltamaly A.M. A comprehensive comparison of different MPPT techniques for photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy, 2015, vol. 112, pp. 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.11.010.

Hadjidj N., Benbrahim M., Ounnas D., Mouss L.H. Global maximum power point tracking method for photovoltaic systems using Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy models and ANFIS approach. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, 2025, no. 2, pp. 31-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2025.2.05.

Boudia A., Messalti S., Zeghlache S., Harrag A. Type-2 fuzzy logic controller-based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic system. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, 2025, no. 1, pp. 16-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2025.1.03.

Bounechba H., Boussaid A., Bouzid A. Experimental validation of fuzzy logic controller based on voltage perturbation algorithm in battery storage photovoltaic system. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, 2024, no. 5, pp. 20-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2024.5.03.

Romashko V.Y., Batrak L.M., Abakumova O.O. Obtaining the maximum power from the source using step-up and step-down type pulse regulators that work on battery. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, 2024, no. 3, pp. 44-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2024.3.06.

Sira-Ramirez H., Ortega R. Passivity-based controllers for the stabilization of DC-to-DC power converters. Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1995, vol. 4, pp. 3471-3476. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1995.479122.

Seleme S.I.J., Morais L.M.F., Rosa A.H.R., Torres L.A.B. Stability in passivity-based boost converter controller for power factor correction. European Journal of Control, 2013, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 56-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcon.2012.03.001.

Zeng J., Zhang Z., Qiao W. An Interconnection and Damping Assignment Passivity-Based Controller for a DC–DC Boost Converter With a Constant Power Load. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 2014, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 2314-2322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2013.2290872.

Rodriguez H., Ortega R., Escobar G. A robustly stable output feedback saturated controller for the Boost DC-to-DC converter. Proceedings of the 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1999, vol. 3, pp. 2100-2105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.1999.831229.

Baazouzi K., Bensalah A.D., Drid S., Chrifi-Alaoui L. Passivity voltage based control of the boost power converter used in photovoltaic system. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, 2022, no. 2, pp. 11-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2022.2.02.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-02

How to Cite

Toualbia, A., Djilali, A. B., Taleb, R., Mansour, N., Souaihia, M., & Saidi, H. (2025). Application perturb and observe maximum power point tracking with interconnection and damping assignment passive-based control for photovoltaic system using boost converter. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, (6), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2025.6.13

Issue

Section

Industrial Electronics