Determination of the probability of a lightning strike in the elements of the object taking into account the statistical distribution of the current value

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2023.5.08

Keywords:

lightning protection, risk assessment, RSM - Rolling Sphere Method, object of arbitrary shape, probability distribution of lightning current, collection area

Abstract

Problem. Modern international standards in the field of lightning protection, when assessing the probability of a lightning strike into an object, do not take into account the statistical distribution of the lightning current. Goal. Justification of the expediency of taking into account the statistical distribution of the lightning current with a determined probability of lightning striking the elements of the object, and the effectiveness of the application of the improved «rolling sphere» method. Methodology. Method of mathematical modeling, based on RSM with additional consideration of the probability distribution of lightning current. Results. The expediency of taking into account the statistical distribution of lightning current at the determined probability of lightning striking the elements of the object has been proven. The effectiveness of the improved «rolling sphere» method, implemented in the form of a computer program, which takes into account the given probability distribution of lightning current in the range from 2 kA to 200 kA, has been proved. The expediency of introducing the concept of «average value of the area of the collection area» is substantiated, taking into account the probability of lightning with a current in a given range. It has been established that the application of the standardized formula leads to a significant (many times) overestimation of the predicted number of lightning strikes to the object, if the height of the object exceeds 20 m. The reasons for the difference, according to the author, are due to the following properties of the standardized methodology: usually, the real shape of the object is not taken into account; statistical distribution of lightning current is not taken into account; it is based on the results of experimental studies obtained mainly for mast or rod-type objects in laboratory conditions with a limited discharge interval. Practical value. This approach will provide an opportunity to optimize the layout of lightning arresters during the restoration of objects, taking into account green reconstruction. The obtained results are proposed for consideration by the Technical Committee TC 81 IEC for inclusion in the next editions of the standards.

Author Biography

V. V. Kniaziev, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute»

PhD, Senior Research Scientist, Research and Design Institute «Molniya» of National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute»

References

Standard IEC 62305-1:2010 (Ed.2) Protection against Lightning – Part 1: General principles. IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. 78 p.

Standard IEC 62305-2:2010 Protection against lightning – Part 2: Risk management. IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. 87 p.

Standard IEC 62305-3:2010 Protection against lightning – Part 3: Physical damage to structures and life hazards. IEC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2010. 156 p.

Bouquegneau C., Kern A., Rousseau A. Flash density applied to lightning protection standards. International Conference on Grounding and Earthing & 5th International Conference on Lightning Physics and Effects. Bonito – Brazil, November, 2012.

Available at: https://ghrc.nsstc.nasa.gov/lightning/ (accessed 16 March 2023).

Cooray V., Becerra M. Attachment of lightning flashes to grounded structures. Lightning Protection, 2010, pp. 165-268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/PBPO058E_ch4.

Bakar A.H.A., Tan C.K., Abidin A.Z., Khai P.J., Mokhlis H., Illias H.A. Comparative Study on Substation Shielding Due to Direct Lightning Strokes. Journal of Power and Energy Engineering, 2014, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 600-611. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2014.24081.

Cooray V., Rakov V., Theethayi N. The lightning striking distance – Revisited. Journal of Electrostatics, 2007, vol. 65, no. 5-6, pp. 296-306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2006.09.008.

Koliushko D.G., Rudenko S.S., Kiprych S.V. Analysis of the state of the external lightning protection system for operating energy objects. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, 2020, no. 5, pp. 66-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2020.5.10.

Kern A., Brocke R., Raab V., Hannig M., Rock M., Beierl O., Zischank W. Detailed calculation of interception efficiencies for air-termination systems using the dynamic electro-geometrical model – Practical applications. 2016 33rd International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), 2016, pp. 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP.2016.7791518.

Tóth Z., Kiss I., Németh, B. (2021). Relation between the material of roof and the risk of lightning caused damage: The rolling sphere method in the use. Electric Power Systems Research, 196, 107286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107286.

Leal A.F.R., de Oliveira R.M.S., Lopes N.M., de Lima T.S., Ferreira E.R., Rodrigues N.R.N.M. Lightning Protection Design for Small Riverboats Using the FDTD Method. Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications, 2021, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 307-319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-10742021v20i21074.

Guo J., Zhang X., Wang B., Hao X., Zheng S., Xie Y. A three‐dimensional direct lightning strike model for lightning protection of the substation. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 2021, vol. 15, no. 19, pp. 2760-2772. doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12213.

Shostak V., Tyulyukov V. Statistical distributions of current amplitudes and lightning incidence number to structures of various configurations. 2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP), 2014, pp. 1472-1478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICLP.2014.6973362.

Rakov V.A. et al. CIGRE technical brochure on lightning parameters for engineering applications. 2013 International Symposium on Lightning Protection (XII SIPDA), Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 2013, pp. 373-377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/SIPDA.2013.6729246.

Meppelink J. Statistics of Relevant Parameters of Lightning. The Lightning Rod as a Danger, 2023, pp. 143-147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30434-7_15.

Rezinkina M.M., Knyazyev V.V., Kravchenko V.I. Computation of the probability of lightning damage to ground objects. Technical Physics, 2007, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 59-64. doi: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784207010100.

Kniaziev V.V., Melnik S.I. Assessment of probability of lightning direct strike into elements of stationary ground launch complex. Bulletin of the National Technical University «KhPI» Series: Technique and Electrophysics of High Voltage, 2018, no. 14 (1290), pp. 76-81.

Kniaziev V.V. Determination of the probability of a lightning strike to the elements of the launch complex using the modified rolling sphere method. Engineering sciences: Development prospects in countries of Europe at the beginning of the third millennium. Collective monograph. Riga, Baltija Publishing, 2018, vol. 2. 492 p. (pp. 59-92).

Dronov V.M., Kniaziev V.V. Computer program «Calculation of probabilities of lightning protection levels of buildings and structures «Zakhyst-2». Patent UA, no. 63631, 2016.

Dronov V.M., Kniaziev V.V. Computer program «Determination of the effective area of the screed and the probability of lightning damage to the elements of the object». Patent UA, no. 83877, 2018.

Published

2023-08-21

How to Cite

Kniaziev, V. V. (2023). Determination of the probability of a lightning strike in the elements of the object taking into account the statistical distribution of the current value. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, (5), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2023.5.08

Issue

Section

Engineering Electrophysics. High Electric and Magnetic Field Engineering