Power system operational optimization using the kakapo optimization algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2026.3.13

Keywords:

dynamic economic dispatch, kakapo optimization algorithm, metaheuristic optimization, power system operation, valve-point effects, economic load scheduling

Abstract

Introduction. Metaheuristic algorithms are effective for solving complex power system optimization problems characterized by nonlinearity, multimodality, and high dimensionality. Nature-inspired strategies based on adaptive biological behaviors offer significant potential to enhance search efficiency and convergence reliability. The recently published kakapo optimization algorithm (KOA) is employed in this study to address the dynamic economic dispatch (DED) problem over a 24-hour horizon in multi-unit power systems. Problem. The DED problem extends conventional economic load dispatch into a multi-hour planning horizon, considering hourly load variations, generator ramp-rate limits, valve-point effects, and transmission losses. These characteristics render DED highly nonconvex and nonlinear, posing challenges to conventional and metaheuristic techniques. Maintaining a robust balance between global exploration and local exploitation is critical to prevent premature convergence or suboptimal generation schedules. Goal. To apply kakapo optimization algorithm for the dynamic economic dispatch problem, aiming to generate economically optimal and operationally feasible generation schedules over a 24-hour dispatch horizon while preserving population diversity and search stability. Methodology. KOA models two synergistic behavioral phases of the kakapo. Exploration is inspired by lek mating and acoustic signaling, where higher-fitness solutions emit stronger «calls» that probabilistically attract weaker candidates toward promising regions. Exploitation mimics freezing and camouflage strategies, performing fine-grained local adjustments around promising solutions with adaptive step sizes. KOA is applied to a standard five-unit system over 24 hours and benchmarked against nine well-known metaheuristics. Results. KOA achieves the lowest total generation cost, rapid convergence, and high robustness. Statistical performance metricsincluding mean, best, worst, standard deviation, and rankconsistently favor KOA, confirming its effectiveness for multi-dimensional, multi-modal DED problems. Scientific novelty. KOA introduces a biologically inspired, self-adaptive search framework that balances exploration and exploitation without external control parameters. Practical value. The algorithm provides a reliable, versatile, and computationally efficient optimization tool for complex power system dispatch problems, with potential applications in renewable integration, multi-objective optimization, and real-time adaptive operations. References 29, tables 4, figures 2.

Author Biographies

S. A. Alomari, Jadara University

PhD, Associate Professor, Computer Science Department, Faculty of Information Technology

A. Smerat, Al-Ahliyya Amman University

Candidate PhD, Lecturer, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Department of Biosciences, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai

O. P. Malik, University of Calgary

PhD, Professor, Department of Electrical and Software Engineering

R. Abu Zitar, Liwa University

PhD, Professor, College of Engineering and Computing

M. Dehghani, Shiraz University of Technology

PhD, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Z. Montazeri, Shiraz University of Technology

PhD, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

References

Chen X., Zhang Z. Enhanced heap-based optimization algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch considering electric vehicle charging integration. Energy, 2025, vol. 324, art. no. 135955. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2025.135955.

Sun L., An W., Chen Y., Zhao P., Ding D. An overview of distributed economic dispatch of microgrids: advances and challenges. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 2025, vol. 13, no. 1, art. no. 2467077. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2025.2467077.

Marzbani F., Abdelfatah A. Economic Dispatch Optimization Strategies and Problem Formulation: A Comprehensive Review. Energies, 2024, vol. 17, no. 3, art. no. 550. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17030550.

Xia X., Elaiw A.M. Optimal dynamic economic dispatch of generation: A review. Electric Power Systems Research, 2010, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 975-986. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2009.12.012.

Qawaqneh H. et al. Pipefish Optimization Algorithm (POA): A Nature-inspired Metaheuristic for Robust and Adaptive Global Optimization. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 2025, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 778-794. doi: https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2025.1231.48.

Matoušová I. et al. Mother optimization algorithm: a new human-based metaheuristic approach for solving engineering optimization. Scientific Reports, 2023, vol. 13, no. 1, art. no. 10312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37537-8.

Qawaqneh H. et al. Black-breasted Lapwing Algorithm (BBLA): A Novel Nature-inspired Metaheuristic for Solving Constrained Engineering Optimization. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 2025, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 581-597. doi: https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2025.1231.36.

Dinler Ö.B. et al. Blue-eared Hedgehog Optimization (BEHO): A Nature-inspired Metaheuristic for Robust and Efficient Global Optimization. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 2025, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 133-148. doi: https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2025.1231.08.

Manikandan K., Sasikumar S., Arulraj R. A novelty approach to solve an economic dispatch problem for a renewable integrated micro-grid using optimization techniques. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, 2023, no. 4, pp. 83-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2023.4.12.

Desai J.P. Transmission line planning using global best artificial bee colony method. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, 2023, no. 5, pp. 83-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2023.5.12.

Bouhadouza B., Sadaoui F. Optimal power flow analysis under photovoltaic and wind power uncertainties using the blood-sucking leech optimizer. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, 2025, no. 6, pp. 15-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2025.6.03.

Laouafi F. Improved grey wolf optimizer for optimal reactive power dispatch with integration of wind and solar energy. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, 2025, no. 1, pp. 23-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2025.1.04.

Wang Y., Xiong G. Metaheuristic optimization algorithms for multi-area economic dispatch of power systems: Part I – A comprehensive survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2025, vol. 58, no. 4, art. no. 98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11070-0.

Hassan M.H., Mohamed E.M., Kamel S., Eslami M. Dynamic economic dispatch with uncertain wind power generation using an enhanced artificial hummingbird algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, 2025, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 7397-7422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-025-10982-4.

Mandal B., Roy P.K., Paul C. Dynamic Economic Dispatch Problem in Hybrid Renewable Energy Sources Based Power Systems Using Chaotic Hippopotamus Optimization Algorithm. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-025-00893-4.

Nagarajan K., Rajagopalan A., Bajaj M., Sitharthan R., Dost Mohammadi S.A., Blazek V. Optimizing dynamic economic dispatch through an enhanced Cheetah-inspired algorithm for integrated renewable energy and demand-side management. Scientific Reports, 2024, vol. 14, no. 1, art. no. 3091. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53688-8.

Zou D., Gong D. Differential evolution based on migrating variables for the combined heat and power dynamic economic dispatch. Energy, 2022, vol. 238, art. no. 121664. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121664.

Yang W., Zhang Y., Zhu X., Li K., Yang Z. Research on Dynamic Economic Dispatch Optimization Problem Based on Improved Grey Wolf Algorithm. Energies, 2024, vol. 17, no. 6, art. no. 1491. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17061491.

Hao W.-K., Wang J.-S., Li X.-D., Wang M., Zhang M. Arithmetic optimization algorithm based on elementary function disturbance for solving economic load dispatch problem in power system. Applied Intelligence, 2022, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 11846-11872. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-021-03125-4.

Qawaqneh H. et al. Kakapo Optimization Algorithm (KOA): A Novel Bio-inspired Metaheuristic for Optimization Applications. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 2025, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 913-929. doi: https://doi.org/10.22266/ijies2025.1231.56.

Holland J.H. Genetic Algorithms. Scientific American, 1992, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 66-73. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24939139.

Kennedy J., Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN’95 - International Conference on Neural Networks, 1995, vol. 4, pp. 1942-1948. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968.

Rashedi E., Nezamabadi-pour H., Saryazdi S. GSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm. Information Sciences, 2009, vol. 179, no. 13, pp. 2232-2248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004.

Mirjalili S., Lewis A. The Whale Optimization Algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, vol. 95, pp. 51-67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008.

Rao R.V., Savsani V.J., Vakharia D.P. Teaching–learning-based optimization: A novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Computer-Aided Design, 2011, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 303-315. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2010.12.015.

Mirjalili S., Mirjalili S.M., Hatamlou A. Multi-Verse Optimizer: a nature-inspired algorithm for global optimization. Neural Computing and Applications, 2016, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 495-513. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-015-1870-7.

Kaur S., Awasthi L.K., Sangal A.L., Dhiman G. Tunicate Swarm Algorithm: A new bio-inspired based metaheuristic paradigm for global optimization. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2020, vol. 90, art. no. 103541. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103541.

Mirjalili S., Mirjalili S.M., Lewis A. Grey Wolf Optimizer. Advances in Engineering Software, 2014, vol. 69, pp. 46-61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007.

Faramarzi A., Heidarinejad M., Mirjalili S., Gandomi A.H. Marine Predators Algorithm: A nature-inspired metaheuristic. Expert Systems with Applications, 2020, vol. 152, art. no. 113377. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113377.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-02

How to Cite

Alomari, S. A., Smerat, A., Malik, O. P., Abu Zitar, R., Dehghani, M., & Montazeri, Z. (2026). Power system operational optimization using the kakapo optimization algorithm for dynamic economic dispatch. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics, (3), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272X.2026.3.13

Issue

Section

Power Stations, Grids and Systems